 Time to rethink the dinner? That’s the argument New York Times chief White House correspondent Peter Baker made hours after President Donald Trump took the stage for the White House Correspondents’ Dinner do-over on Friday, and launched into an hourlong meandering monologue that doubled as a diatribe against specific journalists, the media generally, and the president’s various political and personal critics. The White House Correspondents’ Association and the press corps have struggled with how to celebrate work that’s often unflattering to the president, as the president loudly complains about and tries to undermine that very work. The WHCA decided to book a mentalist this year; the group had to cancel the comic at last year’s dinner after she’d angered Trump’s team. During Trump’s first term, in 2019, the organization replaced the comedian with a historian (what’s better than press freedom history at 10 pm on a Saturday night?). COVID bailed the WHCA out of booking a follow-up act in 2020. It’s an annual dance that’s gotten increasingly tiresome for many in the White House press corps, some of whom seem ready to heed Baker’s advice. CNN staff in particular are livid about comments the president made about anchor Kaitlan Collins. CNN execs and leadership have attended the dinner and participated in the annual festivities partly as an opportunity to celebrate the network’s hardworking journalists, and partly to avoid the optics of making a political statement by not going. But following Friday’s dinner, some network leaders internally discussed the possibility of scaling back the network’s presence at the dinner next year — or skipping it altogether, if it is going to be a platform for making crude remarks at their employees’ expense. An executive at another TV network appeared to agree with CNN’s frustration when I asked them over the weekend what they thought of this year’s spectacle. Another Washington media boss I spoke to pointed out that the WHCA could have used the do-over as an opportunity to reimagine the event. But instead, on Friday night, the organization congratulated itself on throwing essentially the exact same dinner it had planned for April, and got the result — a critical and insult-heavy speech — that many had feared then, before the violence. The verdict from this exec: “Missed opportunity.” Also today: A California senator aims to slow the spread of undisclosed influencer ads after his state’s wild primary. |