 The hallmark of Zhu Rongji, the former Chinese premier who died last week, was his fearless energy. “I have prepared 100 coffins,” he declared at the outset of his tenure, “99 for corrupt officials and one for myself.” For the nation’s workers, Zhu’s no-holds-barred assault on recalcitrant bureaucrats cut both ways. On the one hand, shuttering thousands of loss-making state enterprises smashed their “iron rice bowl” — a lifetime of guaranteed employment and welfare benefits. But he also forced socialist “work units” to hand over ownership of the apartments that housed their workers to the employees themselves. That was perhaps the greatest one-off transfer of public wealth into private hands in human history. Today, the country’s economic woes are strikingly similar to those Zhu encountered when he took office in 1998 amid the Asian financial crisis: Slowing growth, price deflation, mounting debt. And China needs another Zhu. Were he now in government, he would have wondered why China wasn’t doing more to boost consumer confidence and stimulate domestic demand, Fred Hu — once part of Zhu’s informal kitchen cabinet and now the founder and CEO of Primavera Capital Group, a private equity firm — told me. He’d also have been dismayed to see China entangled in bitter trade disputes with the US and Europe. And ultimately, Hu added, “What Zhu would feel most uneasy about is the loss of reform momentum altogether.” Zhu would’ve also likely challenged China’s leadership about the worsening quality of economic statistics, Joerg Wuttke, a partner at Albright Stonebridge Group and formerly the China head of the chemicals firm BASF, added. In 2018, when Wuttke met Zhu in his retirement, the former premier asked: “How can you make economic policy decisions when you cannot trust data like non-performing loans?” Since then, numerous data sets, including youth unemployment, have been abandoned. And even if Zhu were impressed by Chinese high-tech success, as he surely would be, said Arthur Kroeber, the founding partner of Gavekal Economics, he would have been “appalled by the waste, debt, and indifference to consumer welfare and sentiment that have arisen alongside that success.” |