• D.C.
  • BXL
  • Lagos
  • Dubai
  • Beijing
  • SG
rotating globe
  • D.C.
  • BXL
  • Lagos
Semafor Logo
  • Dubai
  • Beijing
  • SG

In today’s edition, corporate dealmaking, like the rest of Wall Street, has lost its swagger.͏‌  ͏‌  ͏‌  ͏‌  ͏‌  ͏‌ 
cloudy New York
cloudy London
cloudy Dearborn, Mich.
rotating globe
January 31, 2023


Sign up for our free newsletters
Liz Hoffman
Liz Hoffman

Hi and welcome back to Semafor Business, a twice-weekly look at the world of big money from Bradley Saacks and me.

I was doing my biannual re-read of Barbarians at the Gate during a Christmas COVID-19 quarantine, as one does, and was struck by the larger-than-life investment bankers in the saga of the RJR Nabisco buyout: Drexel’s manic Jeff Beck, who ate an entire box of dog biscuits to impress a client; the ice-veined Tom Hill, who wore his Paul Stuart suits like a coat of armor; the unkempt Bruce Wasserstein, forever swearing he wasn’t the leak.

Today’s crop of M&A bankers is decidedly lacking in swagger. That’s not an indictment of their skills, or the narrative abilities of the reporters chronicling them (I hope — I’ve been one of them). It’s a reflection of today’s Wall Street, where ego is a liability, capital is a commodity, and legal bumper lanes guide most deals to the finish line. Today I dig into what happened and what it says about finance today.

Plus, U.S. home affordability hits a record low, central banks are about to raise interest rates to their highest levels since 2008, and banks start lending again, sort of.


➚ BUY: Rates. Central bankers in the U.S., Europe, and the U.K. are set to raise rates this week to their highest levels since just after Bear Stearns fell. The pace of hikes is expected to slow as inflation eases.

➘ SELL: Gates. The world’s sixth-richest man faced a new round of questions over his ties to Jeffrey Epstein (“I shouldn’t have had dinners with him,” Bill Gates told an Australian interviewer this week.) Meanwhile, gates are going up at private investment funds as asset prices swing and investors try to redeem their money.

Semafor Stat

The percentage of prospective U.S. homebuyers who can’t afford most houses in their market, thanks to rising mortgage rates, according to the National Association of Home Builders. That’s a record high, up from 69% in the third quarter, and a bitter win for the Federal Reserve in its fight against rising home prices.

Unsplash/Amanda Smith
Liz Hoffman

What happened to the star investment banker?


A decade ago, Morgan Stanley’s star dealmaker left the firm, hung out his shingle, and quickly landed plum roles on two giant deals for Verizon ($130 billion) and Comcast ($45 billion) that spun heads across Wall Street.

Paul Taubman’s success seemed to herald a golden age for superstar bankers, with enviable Rolodexes and unshackled from their giant firms, which were then mired in a post-crisis funk. In the years that followed, boutiques founded by big-bank breakaways peeled away business from the old guard.

That era is over. Taubman was the last major big-bank star whose firm has made a meaningful dent in the M&A leaderboard. PJT Partners and a small group of older rival boutiques — Evercore, Centerview, Perella Weinberg — are profitable and elite. But they aren’t a threat to the existing Wall Street order.

And almost nobody has followed behind them. Of the 20 most-active boutique banks tracked by Dealogic, only one, the Goldman Sachs superband Ardea Partners, was founded after 2015. The usual trio of big banks — Goldman Sachs, Morgan Stanley, and JPMorgan — have maintained their iron grip on the top of the annual rankings of merger advisers, with noticeably less of the headline-grabbing star wattage of decades past.

Fortune magazine has highlighted only one banker on its cover in the past five years and it was Citigroup’s new CEO, Jane Fraser, a former McKinsey consultant who made her name not as a swaggering dealmaker but as an internal strategy guru and clean-up specialist.


The game has changed and so have the players.

Deals have become more commoditized. Big companies now have sophisticated in-house teams that scour the market for takeover targets and analyze their own holdings for things to sell. Some have even hired former Wall Street stars to do it: Comcast and Thermo Fisher, two serial dealmakers, have former bankers running their internal M&A teams.

The Wild West days of tactical M&A are gone. In the 1980s and 1990s, bankers engineered genuinely innovative moves — the Pac-Man defense, the poison pill, the cram-down tender offer. Since then, courts have sorted out which are kosher and which aren’t. And the rise of huge index funds that dominate shareholder registries has changed the game from a war of tactics to one of persuasion. (Cue the proliferation of specialized M&A communications shops.)

“You can’t sprinkle the same magic,” said Ronald Barusch, who retired in 2010 after three decades as an M&A lawyer at Skadden.

As the value of tactical brilliance dwindled, along came a new, all-important client group that couldn’t care less about it. Private-equity firms are the biggest fee-payers for big banks, and by and large are interested in one thing: financing.

They don’t want hotshot bankers telling them what they should buy and how to do it, then charging them $50 million for the advice. They are, however, willing to pay up for debt, and that’s encouraged banks that once lived on the sell-side of transactions, like Goldman Sachs, to start angling to represent buyers and provide the loans they need, which come with huge fees.

Consider one of today’s last superstar bankers. Michael Grimes, Morgan Stanley’s whisperer in Silicon Valley, has enough name recognition with tech founders to have struck out on his own. He’s guided nearly every major tech IPO of the past decade and displayed the showmanship of generations past. (He moonlighted – for years! – as an Uber driver in a successful bid to win that coveted IPO for Morgan Stanley.)

But boutique banks don’t underwrite stock offerings, and much of Grimes’ magic is tethered to Morgan Stanley’s balance sheet and stock-trading desk.

There’s a generational element at play, too. Bankers who might have retired in the years after 2008 instead stuck around to rebuild personal wealth decimated by the crash. Their underlings, who would now be in their forties and potential household names, instead stayed on the bench.

On Wall Street that’s called the “execution team,” the army of bankers who prepare Powerpoint presentations, run the numbers, and deliver the all-important but rote “fairness opinion” evaluating a transaction’s merits. They are increasingly crucial to the assembly-line nature of modern dealmaking, but are unlikely to ever be called “M&A jedis.”

A last reason, I think, is harder to capture, but clearly reflective of the post-2008 Wall Street. There is simply less tolerance for ego. “There’s no way a bank today — or its regulator — is going to allow a thirty-something hotshot take on the [profile] that Jimmy Lee did,” said Richard Farley, a partner at Kramer Levin Naftalis & Frankel, referring to JPMorgan Chase’s legendary money man, who died in 2015 as one of Wall Street’s most-revered bankers.


The end game may no longer be launching a boutique. Seeing the fortunes made in private equity, some of the biggest names in M&A are trying their hand at a hybrid adviser/investor role. Why help bake the cake when you can eat it too?

Goldman’s star tech and media banker Gregg Lemkau left in 2020 to run Michael Dell’s investment firm, then merged it with the family office advisory and investment shop run by Byron Trott, another former big-bank rainmaker. Skip McGee, a top banker at Lehman Brothers and then Barclays, invests alongside the energy companies he advises.

It’s a revival for old-school “merchant banking,” which fell out of favor at big banks after 2008, and may be the new shiny object for star bankers who have seen their own paychecks decline and their clients get rich.


A previous version of the story misstated the bank where Thermo Fisher’s head of M&A used to work.” The story has been updated to remove the error.”


First technology came for manual jobs. Now, with next-generation artificial intelligence on the horizon, white-collar workers — teachers, coders … journalists — are starting to get nervous. A look at the historical productivity gains aided by automation is unlikely to ease their angst.


Carlos Watkins is pitching OZY to potential investors at IPG’s big media conference next week in New York, 15 months after the media company folded, and then un-folded, amid a federal investigation into allegations that it had defrauded investors and overstated its audience reach.

PA Images via Reuters

Banks are lending again — a little. The syndicated loan market, in which banks arrange loans for companies and private-equity firms and distribute the debt to their clients, has cracked open in recent days. Caesars Entertainment sought a $1.75 billion loan last week and ended up with $2.5 billion, and private-equity firm Stonepeak was marketing two bank loans. Lending desks have been closed for months, opening the door for private credit funds to horn in. 



One Good Text with... Dan Runcie

Justin Bieber is the latest — and the youngest — artist to cash in on the rights to their music, selling his catalog to Hipgnosis Songs Capital last week for $200 million. Most artists who have sold their catalogs have decades of data proving their music will remain popular (the times may a-change but people still love Bob Dylan) so we checked in with Dan Runcie, founder of music industry research company Trapital, for his take on the deal.


Britain’s top financial watchdog has approved only 15% of crypto company registration applications after tightening its standards, which now require digital-asset companies to follow the same money-laundering rules as traditional financial firms. Just 41 companies have been given the green light, and several with U.S. operations have withdrawn their applications rather than face rejection, according to Blockworks.



Axios’ look at the evolution of the iconic American pick-up, the Ford F-150, is a wonderful examination of consumer trends and virtue-signaling. What used to be a laborer’s truck is basically a minivan. The truck bed is, proportionally, half the size it was in the 1960s as the cabs have grown, all the better to tow kids and groceries.

So why not just get a minivan? It wouldn’t be “rugged” — a word that 50% of truck buyers use to describe their vehicle (compared to just 19% of other auto owners), according to consumer trends research firm Strategic Vision. The price tag for that male posturing has soared: New gas-guzzling F-150s, with all the bells and whistles, sell for more than $80,000 thanks to massaging seats and an 18-speaker sound system.

Counterpoint: The electric version of Ford’s iconic muscle truck, the Lightning, was the number one selling EV truck last year, which suggests consumers are rethinking what “Built Ford Tough” means.

— Bradley

How Are We Doing?

If you’re liking Semafor Business, please share with family, friends, bosses, and juniors. And we want to hear from you — what we got right and wrong, and what we should cover next. You can reply to this email.

To make sure this newsletter makes it to you, be sure to add liz.hoffman@semafor.com and bsaacks@semafor.com to your contacts. In Gmail, drag this newsletter over to your ‘Primary’ tab.

See you Thursday.

Want more Semafor? Explore all our newsletters at semafor.com/newsletters

— Liz and Bradley