The U.S. said on Thursday it will temporarily stop issuing new permits for the construction of liquefied natural gas export terminals, a move hailed by climate activists but opposed by industry groups who have cautioned against such a decision’s impact on future Western energy security.  The decision could have implications worldwide: U.S. LNG exports are currently the world’s highest, having provided a critical backstop to Europe’s heat and electricity systems following Russia’s full-scale invasion of Ukraine last year. Yet the global LNG trading system is close to being overbuilt, which could delay the energy transition. In effect, it underlines one of the hardest needles to thread in the global energy transition: matching the fossil-fuel infrastructure needed in future decades with what is required today. Underinvestment in the name of climate action could lead to supply shortages and price spikes that feed a public backlash against clean energy. But overinvestment means locking in large sources of carbon emissions — if all the proposed U.S. LNG terminals were built, their cumulative carbon footprint would be larger than that of the European Union — and leaving investors out to dry. In reality, the biggest threat to U.S. LNG’s desperate race to seize market share isn’t climate activists. It’s competition from rival exporters like Qatar and Australia. Few of the proposed projects are likely to lock in their final investment commitments regardless of what the Biden administration does, analysts say, because there are more under development than what the global market is likely to require in the coming decades. If every global LNG project under consideration now were to be built, the market would be oversupplied by 2028 and for the foreseeable future after that, according to research firm Rystad Energy. Yet without any of those projects, the market could be severely undersupplied by 2030. The exact size of that gap depends on the speed of renewable energy adoption, especially in China and other Asian countries that are the heart of the LNG market right now. There is room for more cooks in the kitchen, in other words, but only a few. So even a short delay in permitting — until Donald Trump potentially takes office a second time, for example — could be enough to kill many projects. “When we hit a supply glut, which we expect by 2025 regardless of the approval process, new contract signing will slow significantly,” Samantha Dart, head of natural-gas research at Goldman Sachs, told me. “The window of opportunity for more final investment decisions to be reached is about to close.” |