 As a propaganda stunt, “Margaritagate” could have gone much better. Maryland Sen. Chris Van Hollen, the first of several Democrats to visit El Salvador in a search for information about illegal immigrants, negotiated for a meeting with Kilmar Ábrego García. He got one, albeit outside of the CECOT prison where Ábrego was detained. El Salvador President Nayib Bukele shared the first photos: Van Hollen and Ábrego at a table, with two glasses of water and two of a clear liquid that Bukele called “margaritas.” Van Hollen shared his own picture, before Bukele aides placed the mysterious non-waters, which neither man had asked for. “Nobody drank any margaritas or sugar water or whatever it is,” Van Hollen said when he returned. “This is a lesson into the lengths that President Bukele will go to deceive people.” Neither man was photographed drinking the “margaritas.” Bukele claimed, with no evidence, that they were “sipping” them. Yet it was Bukele’s story, not Van Hollen’s, that carried into this week. In the Oval Office, a Newsmax reporter told President Donald Trump that “photos have emerged” of the senator “sipping what appear to be margaritas.” In a Fox News op-ed, the chairman of the Republican Study Committee claimed that Van Hollen had “potentially spent thousands of taxpayer dollars to enjoy a round of margaritas.” In an official letter that rebuked two Democrats who wanted a Congress-funded visit to El Salvador, House Oversight Chairman James Comer falsely claimed that Van Hollen was photographed “enjoying margaritas garnished with cherry slices.” New York Mayor Eric Adams, a Democrat-turned-independent, got in on it, too; at a press conference, he twice said that he wouldn’t drink “a tequila drink” with a gang member. Republicans are very comfortable defending the Ábrego imprisonment, and any other errors made by the president’s deportation regime, because they support its basic goal. Why glom on to this? It was the only detail of the story faked by Bukele’s government, and badly faked. There may be people who garnish margaritas with cherries. I’ve never met one, and I don’t know how I’d react, but the possibility exists. No one drinks these things without disturbing the salt on the rim. A memorable detail can make a story, but if the detail gets debunked, the whole story can get discredited. But it might not be discredited for everyone. All sorts of fake factoids travel through the rotting news/entertainment pipeline, believed by people who want to believe them. The brake on this used to be shame, and that it’s embarrassing to confidently share something fake. Ask Dan Rather, ask Ben Shapiro, ask your uncle who shared a bogus quote from his Facebook feed. If you’re not worried about shame, there’s no brake. Elon Musk, who may or may not be leaving his powerful DOGE role soon (see below), is among the people who share fake politician net-worth figures from AI-generated websites. If your prior is that your political enemies are corrupt, you can find some fake stuff that “proves” it. If your prior is that Nayib Bukele is trying to save not just his country but the West, then you don’t need to hear him debunked. You trust him, and you don’t trust his critics. Even if they’re right. |